[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17789605#comment-17789605
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-16974:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 6b2660edc2052b36ff20ec5e3b972d18a8829d7d in solr's branch
refs/heads/branch_9x from Jan Høydahl
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=solr.git;h=6b2660edc20 ]
SOLR-16974: Documentation and changes entry for global CB (9x) (#2094)
(cherry picked from commit 2bbb06aac63ec2ec94aab73874f09959b39f881f)
> Global Circuit Breakers
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16974
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16974
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Circuit Breakers
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.5
>
> Time Spent: 6h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently Circuit Breakers are configured per core in solrconfig.xml.
> However, cores/collections do not live in isolation, and it could be that a
> cluster administrator would like to enforce circuit breakers for the entire
> cluster.
> I'm not clear as to whether we need both cluster level and a core level
> pluggability. And would core-level breakers add to any cluster-level ones or
> override them for that core?
> A potential design is to add this as a new plugin in solr.xml, and have them
> added in a new static context of CircuitBreakerRegistry. Then the isTripped
> logic would consult both the per-core list and the static/global list of
> breakers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
