liangkaiwen commented on code in PR #3385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3385#discussion_r2164268484


##########
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/core/SchemaCodecFactory.java:
##########
@@ -126,16 +131,41 @@ public DocValuesFormat getDocValuesFormatForField(String 
field) {
           public KnnVectorsFormat getKnnVectorsFormatForField(String field) {
             final SchemaField schemaField = 
core.getLatestSchema().getFieldOrNull(field);
             FieldType fieldType = (schemaField == null ? null : 
schemaField.getType());
-            if (fieldType instanceof DenseVectorField vectorType) {
+            KnnVectorsFormat delegate;

Review Comment:
   That's probably true. However it does look like the getters are used in the 
DenseVectorField tests as KnnVectorsFormat doesn't expose the internal setting 
values. Personally I think it's ok to leave patterned as-is and having getters 
affords some level of flexibility and transparency.
   
   But I can make this change if you feel strongly about it



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to