[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-43:
-------------------------------
Severity: Cosmetic
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.1)
5.0
Remaining Estimate: 4h
Original Estimate: 4h
Most of this is already done but changing the rest would be a binary
incompatible change. Deferred until 5.0.
> names of atomic functions inconsitent
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: STDCXX-43
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-43
> Project: C++ Standard Library
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Martin Sebor
> Assignee: Martin Sebor
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 5.0
>
> Original Estimate: 4h
> Remaining Estimate: 4h
>
> The names of the implementation-specific atomic functions are inconsistent:
> some contain the width of the type they operate on (such as
> __rw_atomic_add32()), others don't (e.g., __rw_atomic_add32()), and others
> still follow a different naming convention altogether (e.g.,
> __rw_atomic_incr32()). This makes understanding and writing the generic
> overloads that use them (e.g., __rw_atomic_preincrement(), etc.) difficult
> and leads to lots of duplicate code in rw/_mutex.h. This is a placeholder
> issue to rename these functions using a consistent naming convention and to
> simplify rw/_mutex.h.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
