[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12584636#action_12584636
]
Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-10:
-------------------------------------
I'm not sure that I understand the problem in STDCXX-8.
The FLOAT.cpp config test print's LDBL_MIN macro value as #define
_RWSTD_LDBL_MIN %LDBL_MIN% (%LDBL_MIN% is the numerical value of the
corresponding macro). Then in include/ansi/float.h we #undefine LDBL_MIN and
#define LDBL_MIN as _RWSTD_LDBL_MIN for EDG compiler or not redefine LDBL_MIN
for other compilers. So what the difference between LDBL_MIN and
_RWSTD_LDBL_MIN? And how _RWSTD_LDBL_MIN macro (which is copy of LDBL_MIN)
caused floating point underflow on icc 8.1?
> LDBL_MIN et al need a test
> --------------------------
>
> Key: STDCXX-10
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-10
> Project: C++ Standard Library
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Tests
> Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Martin Sebor
> Assignee: Farid Zaripov
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.2.1
>
> Original Estimate: 8h
> Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> A test needs to be written for STDCXX-8 (and more generally, for the rest of
> <float.h> and <cfloat> macros). Here's what it might look like:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stdcxx-dev/200508.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
