[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-75?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-75:
-------------------------------

         Severity: Inefficiency
    Fix Version/s: 4.2.0

Looks like this was fixed years ago in 
[r357264|http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=357264] and the fix was 
in 4.2.0.

> [25.fill.cpp] std::fill_n() Size template parameter not exercised
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-75
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-75
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tests
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.3
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Martin Sebor
>            Assignee: Martin Sebor
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>
> From 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-stdcxx-dev/200511.mbox/[EMAIL
>  PROTECTED]:
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:30:26 -0700
> From: Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: test for lib.alg.fill
> Anton Pevtsov wrote:
> > The attached file contains my attempt to update the lib.alg.fill test.
> Excellent, thanks! I've committed it with a few minor changes here:
> > 
> > I have a question about fill_n test: is it necessary to implement a 
> > separate test for the fill_n algorithm
> > with our custom Size class?
> > If so, this test may be updated - currently it just uses size_t.
> You are right, that would be a useful enhancement. Size need only be
> convertible to int, it need not actually support all the same operations
> (such as postincrement). Let me open an issue to keep track of this
> enhancement to the test.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to