[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14135452#comment-14135452
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-910:
-------------------------------------
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/138#discussion_r17601535
--- Diff: tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/conf/TajoConf.java ---
@@ -353,7 +353,10 @@ public static int setDateOrder(int dateOrder) {
$TEST_MIN_TASK_NUM("tajo.test.min-task-num", -1),
// Behavior Control
---------------------------------------------------------
- $BEHAVIOR_ARITHMETIC_ABORT("tajo.behavior.arithmetic-abort", false);
+ $BEHAVIOR_ARITHMETIC_ABORT("tajo.behavior.arithmetic-abort", false),
+
+ // ResultSet ---------------------------------------------------------
+ $RESULT_SET_FETCH_SIZE("tajo.resultset.fetch.size", 200)
--- End diff --
It may be the number of rows. I have a suggestion. In my view,
```fetch.row-num``` is more intuitive. ```fetch.size``` is relatively
mis-understandable, and it seems to be the number of bytes rather than the
number of rows. It's because we have used ```size``` prefix for the number of
bytes in many config keys.
> Simple query (non-forwarded query) should be supported against partition
> tables.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-910
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: distributed query plan, physical operator, tajo master
> Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
> Assignee: Hyoungjun Kim
> Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> There are two types of queries according to whether a query is executed
> across cluster nodes or not.
> We call a query which is executed across cluster nodes *forwarded query*,
> meaning that TajoMaster forwards the query to a query master. In contrast, we
> call a query without distributed execution *simple query* or *non-forwarded
> query*, which executed in only client side. The following query is an example
> of simple query.
> {code}
> select * from table limit 10;
> {code}
> Currently, simple query is only supported against a normal table. We also
> should support it against partitioned tables.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
