[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14135458#comment-14135458
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-910:
-------------------------------------

Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/138#discussion_r17601702
  
    --- Diff: tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/SessionVars.java ---
    @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@
       ARITHABORT(ConfVars.$BEHAVIOR_ARITHMETIC_ABORT,
           "If true, a running query will be terminated when an overflow or 
divide-by-zero occurs.", DEFAULT),
     
    +  // ResultSet 
----------------------------------------------------------------
    +  FETCH_SIZE(ConfVars.$RESULT_SET_FETCH_SIZE, "Sets the number of rows at 
a time from Master", DEFAULT),
    --- End diff --
    
    I'd like to suggest ```FETCH_ROW_NUM``` instead of ```FETCH_SIZE```. It's 
just suggestion.


> Simple query (non-forwarded query) should be supported against partition 
> tables.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-910
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: distributed query plan, physical operator, tajo master
>            Reporter: Hyunsik Choi
>            Assignee: Hyoungjun Kim
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> There are two types of queries according to whether a query is executed 
> across cluster nodes or not.
> We call a query which is executed across cluster nodes *forwarded query*, 
> meaning that TajoMaster forwards the query to a query master. In contrast, we 
> call a query without distributed execution *simple query* or *non-forwarded 
> query*, which executed in only client side. The following query is an example 
> of simple query.
> {code}
> select * from table limit 10;
> {code}
> Currently, simple query is only supported against a normal table. We also 
> should support it against partitioned tables.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to