> On Sept. 19, 2014, 8:18 p.m., Hyunsik Choi wrote:
> > tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/planner/physical/ExternalSortExec.java,
> >  line 406
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25242/diff/4/?file=693383#file693383line406>
> >
> >     In my view, this condition is not too explicit. It is hard for other 
> > code reader to understand the code.
> >     
> >     In order to fully understand this if-condition, readers need to know 
> > lots of knowledges. Especially, code readers should know the fact that all 
> > local files whose start offset is 0 and the the end length is equivalent to 
> > file length can be removed because we can ensure they are are not shared 
> > with other tasks.
> >     
> >     I'd like to suggest three solutions:
> >      * One is that ExternalSort should not remove the input data and only 
> > removes intermediate data generated during external sort.
> >      * Second solution is to add some flags to indicate if each fragment is 
> > originated from local file instead of fetched data.
> >     
> >     If you have other ideas, feel free to suggest the ideas.

If the main purpose is to make the if-condition more clear, I will add comments 
to explain which intermediate file fragments should be deleted or not. I think 
that all intermediate files that will never be used in the future should be 
deleted to save disk space, no matter where the origins of the files are.


- Hai Thanh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25242/#review54015
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 18, 2014, 7:09 a.m., Hai Thanh Mai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/25242/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 7:09 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Tajo and Hyunsik Choi.
> 
> 
> Repository: tajo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> TAJO-983: Worker should directly read Intermediate data stored in localhost 
> rather than fetching
> 
> Currently, worker always fetches all intermediate via Fetcher and than store 
> them in local file system even though some intermediate data already are 
> stored in local file system. It is inefficient and causes unnecessary I/O and 
> extra storage occupation. We should improve it.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-983
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/planner/UniformRangePartition.java
>  db12285 
>   
> tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/planner/physical/ExternalSortExec.java
>  700e34d 
>   tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Fetcher.java 4867fe4 
>   tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/Task.java c9c83d1 
>   tajo-core/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TestFetcher.java b15d523 
>   tajo-storage/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/storage/RawFile.java 1f57675 
>   
> tajo-yarn-pullserver/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/PullServerAuxService.java
>  e6e7ce3 
>   
> tajo-yarn-pullserver/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/TajoPullServerService.java
>  f7bc489 
>   
> tajo-yarn-pullserver/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/pullserver/retriever/FileChunk.java
>  a8b424e 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25242/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hai Thanh Mai
> 
>

Reply via email to