[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186498#comment-15186498
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1686:
--------------------------------------
Github user jihoonson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r55472123
--- Diff: tajo-common/pom.xml ---
@@ -245,6 +249,12 @@
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.apache.hive</groupId>
--- End diff --
This can increase the size of the tajo client. How about moving it to other
modules like tajo-core and tajo-plan?
> Allow Tajo to use Hive UDF
> --------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-1686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1686
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Function/UDF
> Reporter: Jaehwa Jung
> Assignee: Jongyoung Park
>
> Hive has been widely used in this area. Many users have maintained lots of
> big tables through Hive metastore using HiveQL and UDFs. Currently, Tajo
> provides own UDF and Hive users can implement their UDFs in Tajo. But if we
> can wrap Hive UDF in Tajo, it seems that they would be able to use Tajo
> easily for their analysis infrastructure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
