[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186538#comment-15186538
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TAJO-1686:
--------------------------------------
Github user jihoonson commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r55473420
--- Diff: tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/conf/TajoConf.java ---
@@ -309,6 +309,9 @@ public static int setDateOrder(int dateOrder) {
PYTHON_CODE_DIR("tajo.function.python.code-dir", ""),
PYTHON_CONTROLLER_LOG_DIR("tajo.function.python.controller.log-dir",
""),
+ // HIVE UDF
+ HIVE_UDF_DIR("hive.udf.dir", "./lib/hiveudf"),
--- End diff --
How about changing to tajo.function.hive.code-dir?
> Allow Tajo to use Hive UDF
> --------------------------
>
> Key: TAJO-1686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1686
> Project: Tajo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Function/UDF
> Reporter: Jaehwa Jung
> Assignee: Jongyoung Park
>
> Hive has been widely used in this area. Many users have maintained lots of
> big tables through Hive metastore using HiveQL and UDFs. Currently, Tajo
> provides own UDF and Hive users can implement their UDFs in Tajo. But if we
> can wrap Hive UDF in Tajo, it seems that they would be able to use Tajo
> easily for their analysis infrastructure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
