[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14700203#comment-14700203
]
Rohini Palaniswamy commented on TEZ-2300:
-----------------------------------------
bq. Are we waiting until the AM is closed as well?
Actually have no concerns about AM lingering to write history, if you can
completely ensure that processing of DAG has been terminated when the stop()
call returns. Problem here is stop() call returns and there is no clue as to
whether DAG processing is still happening or it has terminated.
> TezClient.stop() takes a lot of time or does not work sometimes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TEZ-2300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2300
> Project: Apache Tez
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Rohini Palaniswamy
> Assignee: Jonathan Eagles
> Attachments: TEZ-2300.1.patch, TEZ-2300.2.patch, TEZ-2300.3.patch,
> TEZ-2300.4.patch, syslog_dag_1428329756093_325099_1_post
>
>
> Noticed this with a couple of pig scripts which were not behaving well (AM
> close to OOM, etc) and even with some that were running fine. Pig calls
> Tezclient.stop() in shutdown hook. Ctrl+C to the pig script either exits
> immediately or is hung. In both cases it either takes a long time for the
> yarn application to go to KILLED state. Many times I just end up calling yarn
> application -kill separately after waiting for 5 mins or more for it to get
> killed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
