[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14728276#comment-14728276
 ] 

Hitesh Shah commented on TEZ-2745:
----------------------------------

Comments: 

DAGAppMaster changes:
   - maybe file a follow up jira for such as serviceInit or start errors to be 
considered fatal but also result in diagnostics to be updated in YARN similar 
to client-AM version mismatch when such as class not found errors happen.
  
General:
    - change to catch Exception instead of catch TezException to be more safe?
       - any reason why only TezException is being caught ( I understand that 
we are only invoking ReflectionUtils ) ? Will all RuntimeException and 
IOExceptions from user code be caught and handled correctly?  

   - inconsistent throws TezException sometimes and throws 
TezReflectionException sometimes on function declarations
      - everyone apart from ReflectionUtils should probably just use " throws 
TezException" 
      - e.g private static void assignDAGScheduler(DAGImpl dag) throws 
TezReflectionException {




> ClassNotFoundException of user code should fail dag
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-2745
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-2745
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0, 0.5.4, 0.6.2, 0.8.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Jeff Zhang
>            Assignee: Jeff Zhang
>         Attachments: TEZ-2745-1.patch, TEZ-2745-2.patch, TEZ-2745-3.patch
>
>
> This ClassNotFoundException is not captured now. The current behavior is AM 
> crashed and relaunched again until max app attempt is reached. 
> Here's user code used in AM:
> * EdgeManager
> * VertexManager
> * InputInitializer
> * OutputCommitter
> * Other user pluggable components (like DAGScheduler, HistoryServiceLogging 
> etc.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to