[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15139968#comment-15139968
 ] 

Hitesh Shah commented on TEZ-3029:
----------------------------------

Comments: 

 - dag names are not unique. On error should not use it as an identifier. 
 - non-needed change in ContainerLauncher.java? 
 - why is ServicePluginError needed? Doesnt the fatal error reporting handle 
the permanent case? UPDATE: Looks like onError is being removed - should tag 
this jira as an incompatible change? 
 - processNonFatalServiceErrorReport() - shouldnt this fail the dag instead of 
killing it? 
 - s/diag= "/diagnostics="/ - better for readability.


> Add an onError method to service plugin contexts
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3029
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3029
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Siddharth Seth
>            Assignee: Siddharth Seth
>         Attachments: TEZ-3029.1.txt
>
>
> This is to indicate errors which may occur while running threads etc.
> One bit to be careful about is that this introduces two means of reporting 
> errors - which has been challenging to handle in the past for 
> Input/Processor/OutputContext - so whether to do this or not needs to be 
> thought through.
> TaskSchedulerContext already has this method.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to