[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16005282#comment-16005282
 ] 

Jason Lowe commented on TEZ-3718:
---------------------------------

Last I checked, MapReduce doesn't have task duration factored into the decision 
to re-submit.

As for container timeout vs. task timeout, I definitely agree that if we have 
fresh heartbeats from the container yet fail to receive a task heartbeat in the 
required interval then that's a task failure.  If the container heartbeat timed 
out then we might want to treat it as a kill, although I'm a bit worried if the 
issue that caused the timeout is pathological in the setup and every container 
does it.  Wouldn't we run forever, constantly killing instead of failing?

> Better handling of 'bad' nodes
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-3718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-3718
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Siddharth Seth
>
> At the moment, the default behaviour in case of a node being marked bad is to 
> do nothing other than not schedule new tasks on this node.
> The alternate, via config, is to retroactively kill every task which ran on 
> the node, which causes far too many unnecessary re-runs.
> Proposing the following changes.
> 1. KILL fragments which are currently in the RUNNING state (instead of 
> relying on a timeout which leads to the attempt being marked as FAILED after 
> the timeout interval.
> 2. Keep track of these failed nodes, and use this as input to the failure 
> heuristics. Normally source tasks require multiple consumers to report 
> failure for them to be marked as bad. If a single consumer reports failure 
> against a source which ran on a bad node, consider it bad and re-schedule 
> immediately. (Otherwise failures can take a while to propagate, and jobs get 
> a lot slower).
> [~jlowe] - think you've looked at this in the past. Any thoughts/suggestions.
> What I'm seeing is retroactive failures taking a long time to apply, and 
> restart sources which ran on a bad node. Also running tasks being counted as 
> FAILURES instead of KILLS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to