[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-4192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mustafa Iman updated TEZ-4192:
------------------------------
    Attachment: HIVE-23589.patch

> Attach task specific info in scheduler and retrieve in communicator
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-4192
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-4192
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.2
>            Reporter: Mustafa Iman
>            Assignee: Mustafa Iman
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: TEZ-4192.1.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There is no way to pass information from scheduler to communicator. Sometimes 
> we want to let communicator know about extra properties of the task other 
> than its spec. One example is if a task is preemptable.
> When scheduler receives a task, its taskspec is already constructed. It is a 
> nice immutable object at this point. We do not want to modify and put more 
> info in it at that stage. So we pass a new piece of information to 
> TaskSchedulerContext#taskAllocated along with the allocation. This info is 
> passed to the communicator untouched. It is up to the communicator 
> implementation to make use of it. Communicator implementation needs to 
> override a new registerRunningTaskAttempt that accepts this additional object 
> along with all the other arguments in the original registerRunningTaskAttempt 
> method.
> The new registerRunningTaskAttempt method has a default implementation that 
> falls back to the old method. So if the user does not override the new 
> method, the same old behavior is preserved. Similarly on scheduler side, the 
> user needs to call new taskAllocated method to pass the additional info 
> object. If they use the old taskAllocated method, old behavior is preserved.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to