[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13995890#comment-13995890
]
Alan M. Carroll commented on TS-2796:
-------------------------------------
It's possible that we're leaking fragment tables, which were moved to the
alternates in 4.0. In general they should be cleared in {{free_CacheVC}} but
it's possible that during a write the table gets created but not freed by
{{CacheVC::destroy}}. The ones loaded from disk should be cleaned up by the
call to {{vector::clear()}} in {{free_CacheVC}}. One way to validate this would
be to do a check in {{free_CacheVC}} just before the call
{{cont->alternate.clear()}} and see if it still has an allocated fragment table
{code}m_frag_offsets && m_frag_offsets != m_integral_frag_offsets{code} This is
in iocore/cache/P_CacheInternal.h.
> Leaking CacheVConnections
> -------------------------
>
> Key: TS-2796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2796
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cache
> Affects Versions: 4.0.2, 4.2.1, 5.0.0
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Labels: yahoo
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
>
> It appears there is a memory leak in 4.0.x, 4.2.x, and master leaking
> CacheVConnections resulting in IOBufAllocator leaking also, here is an
> example:
> allocated | in-use | type size | free list name
> 67108864 | 0 | 2097152 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[14]
> 67108864 | 19922944 | 1048576 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[13]
> 4798283776 | 14155776 | 524288 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[12]
> 7281311744 | 98304000 | 262144 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[11]
> 1115684864 | 148242432 | 131072 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[10]
> 4974444544 | 379977728 | 65536 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[9]
> 9902751744 | 5223546880 | 32768 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[8]
> 14762901504 | 14762311680 | 16384 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[7]
> 6558056448 | 6557859840 | 8192 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[6]
> 41418752 | 30502912 | 4096 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[5]
> 524288 | 0 | 2048 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[4]
> 0 | 0 | 1024 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[3]
> 0 | 0 | 512 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[2]
> 32768 | 0 | 256 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[1]
> 0 | 0 | 128 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[0]
> 2138112 | 2124192 | 928 |
> memory/cacheVConnection
> [~bcall] has observed this issue on 4.0.x, and we have observed this on 4.2.x.
> The code path in CacheVC that is allocating the IoBuffers is
> memory/IOBuffer/Cache.cc:2603; however, that's just the observable symptom
> the real issue here is the leaking CacheVC.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
