[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13996050#comment-13996050
]
Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-2796:
-----------------------------------
Good explanation, this actually now makes some sense as to the reclaimable
freelist "issues"; the change in payload characteristics changing RAM cache
objects. This explains why most of us don't see this issue ever, since we have
very consistent payload characteristics.
Does the CLFUS have different behavior here compared to the LRU RAM cache? It'd
be surprising if it is, but if that is the case, we should fix CLFUS.
> Leaking CacheVConnections
> -------------------------
>
> Key: TS-2796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2796
> Project: Traffic Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Cache
> Affects Versions: 4.0.2, 4.2.1, 5.0.0
> Reporter: Brian Geffon
> Labels: yahoo
> Fix For: 5.0.0
>
>
> It appears there is a memory leak in 4.0.x, 4.2.x, and master leaking
> CacheVConnections resulting in IOBufAllocator leaking also, here is an
> example:
> allocated | in-use | type size | free list name
> 67108864 | 0 | 2097152 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[14]
> 67108864 | 19922944 | 1048576 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[13]
> 4798283776 | 14155776 | 524288 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[12]
> 7281311744 | 98304000 | 262144 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[11]
> 1115684864 | 148242432 | 131072 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[10]
> 4974444544 | 379977728 | 65536 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[9]
> 9902751744 | 5223546880 | 32768 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[8]
> 14762901504 | 14762311680 | 16384 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[7]
> 6558056448 | 6557859840 | 8192 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[6]
> 41418752 | 30502912 | 4096 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[5]
> 524288 | 0 | 2048 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[4]
> 0 | 0 | 1024 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[3]
> 0 | 0 | 512 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[2]
> 32768 | 0 | 256 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[1]
> 0 | 0 | 128 |
> memory/ioBufAllocator[0]
> 2138112 | 2124192 | 928 |
> memory/cacheVConnection
> [~bcall] has observed this issue on 4.0.x, and we have observed this on 4.2.x.
> The code path in CacheVC that is allocating the IoBuffers is
> memory/IOBuffer/Cache.cc:2603; however, that's just the observable symptom
> the real issue here is the leaking CacheVC.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
