[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14396243#comment-14396243
 ] 

Leif Hedstrom commented on TS-3475:
-----------------------------------

Roger, makes sense. I'll look again. The allocator template object will retain 
the defaults from RecordsConfig, but let me cleanup the rest. !et me ponder on 
how we should make sure this is consistently retained, maybe it's too fragile 
to mandate that RecordsConf can not be modified for these settings unless the 
protocol changes?

> Add configuration knobs for HTTP/2
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3475
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3475
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HTTP/2
>            Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>            Assignee: Leif Hedstrom
>             Fix For: 6.0.0
>
>         Attachments: TS-3475-3.diff
>
>
> We currently have the following SPDY configs, we should have at least the 
> same ones for HTTP/2:
> {code}
>   {RECT_CONFIG, "proxy.config.spdy.max_concurrent_streams_in", RECD_INT, 
> "100", RECU_DYNAMIC, RR_NULL, RECC_STR, "^[0-9]+$", RECA_NULL}
>   {RECT_CONFIG, "proxy.config.spdy.no_activity_timeout_in", RECD_INT, "115", 
> RECU_DYNAMIC, RR_NULL, RECC_STR, "^[0-9]+$", RECA_NULL}
>   {RECT_CONFIG, "proxy.config.spdy.initial_window_size_in", RECD_INT, 
> "1048576", RECU_DYNAMIC, RR_NULL, RECC_STR, "^[0-9]+$", RECA_NULL}
>   {RECT_CONFIG, "proxy.config.spdy.accept_no_activity_timeout", RECD_INT, 
> "120", RECU_DYNAMIC, RR_NULL, RECC_STR, "^[0-9]+$", RECA_NULL}
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to