[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-5030?focusedWorklogId=31877&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-31877
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on TS-5030:
--------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 09/Nov/16 16:32
            Start Date: 09/Nov/16 16:32
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: Github user calavera commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1184
  
    I made some changes to not use the TS API internally and use the arena for 
memory allocation. I'd really appreciate another review.
    
    I tagged the issue in Jira with `TS API`, should I add any other tags?


Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 31877)
    Time Spent: 1h 10m  (was: 1h)

> Proposal: Add API to get the client request UUID directly from a TSHttpTx
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-5030
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-5030
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: TS API
>            Reporter: David Calavera
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The new UUID api introduced in 
> https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/736 is great for tracing 
> operations and requests. However, the most useful information for plugin 
> developers, the unique client request id, is not exposed as an api endpoint. 
> People need to understand very well how TrafficServer works internally to 
> generate this value. By not having the API directly exposed, people need to 
> repeat the same code every time they want to generate this unique identifier.
> I'd like to add an API enpoint to generate this identifier based in a given 
> http transaction for plugins to use.
> This would be the signature:
> tsapi const char * TSClientRequestUuidGet(TSHttpTxn txnp);



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to