[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17104498#comment-17104498
]
Mate Szalay-Beko commented on ZOOKEEPER-3792:
---------------------------------------------
> I noticed when doing the 3.5.7 release, and manually corrected the links
I think your manual correction has been updated since then, as it doesn't work
now: [https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.5.7/index.html]
> Anyway, we talked that probably jute api docs is not even necessary to link
yep, the Jute classes are auto-generated for our internal API, I don't see much
value to publish javadoc for them.
[~tison] do you plan to work on the fix? (this is our current procedure to
generate the website: [https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/website] )
If you have no time for this right now, then do you mind if I take this over?
(although I don't think this is very high priority, nobody asked for the
javadocs, and we publish the source in maven central, so I think most of the
developers use their IDE to read it)
> Reconcile document site in 3.5.7 & 3.6.0
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-3792
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3792
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Affects Versions: 3.6.0, 3.5.7
> Reporter: Zili Chen
> Assignee: Zili Chen
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> After ZOOKEEPER-3369 we generate document in {{apidocs/}} instead of {{api/}}
> before. Moreover, the document site cannot proper linked to apidocs in
> 3.6.0(but in 3.5.7, thought it is wrong in {{website}} branch, it is manually
> corrected in {{asf-site}} branch}}.
> I propose we generate single aggregated document and place it under {{api/}}
> folder, as well as bumping website for the update.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
