On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Felipe Contreras <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:39:03PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> Is there a way to update the flags locally fast?
> >>
> > not really, and i don't see how the problem could be generally avoided.
> > you may get something useful by setting MaxMessages (but note that it
> > still doesn't work for a new sync of an existing huge mailbox).
> > it may also be possible to achieve something similar with a "timed"
> > gmail tag (=> vfolder), if they support that.
>
> I guess it's time to move to offlineimap, where both of these things
> just work out of the box.
Sadly offlineimap has tons of stability and efficiency issues. In general,
I find mbsync does a much much better job. In my case, it's only the
MaxMessages flag I miss.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
