On Wed 11 Dec 2013 at 10:41:13AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > it makes maintaining parallel branches somewhat difficult > > yes, i know. sorry for that. for all i know you are the only one who > ever maintained a branch (you still do? why? let's talk about it!),
Haha, yes this may well be true. These branches have nothing worth
sharing (just playing around) and are only deployed on my personal
machine. If it were otherwise, I would certainly share them with this
list and publish them per the license.
> > and is contrary to the goals of revision control.
>
> that's not the only way to see it. i favor usefulness (and neatness,
> i'll admit ^^) over accuracy.
Linear history without reverts and merges does help with `git blame`,
so I understand. The trade-off with munging public history, however, is
that it hinders collaboration.
Regardless, I am happy to have a source repository and not just
tarballs. I just thought I'd call you out this one time. :)
Thank you for the software.
guns
pgpd2b6pw9OcK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
