On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:28:42PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> writes: > > note that there is also a sasl branch in git. you can take a lot from > > the commit and also the review in the commit message. > > ideally, revive it as well. > > It looks like the sasl code does slightly more than mine, and is > simpler. Reviving the branch makes sense to me. > > Just to be sure. Do you prefer the sasl implementation, or pure GSSAPI? > if i read it right, SASL is basically a PAM equivalent for network auth, so it's more generic than interfacing directly with gssapi, and thus lowers the overall cost. unless you think it would come with some significant downsides over gssapi (depedencies?), it probably makes sense to go a sasl-only route. failing that, it may make sense to have sasl ifdefs, and specific other ifdefs (gssapi and cram-md5 so far) in the else branches. convince me either way. :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
