Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> writes: >On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:29:52AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: >> Here's second version of my patch. I decided to kind of revive (I >> cleaned it up a lot) the original sasl branch. Since the SASL support >> will already be there, I don't think it makes sense to have additional >> code for GSSAPI only. >> > so i finally had a go at it. > the sasl branch contains my new version (on top of a lot of ssl stuff > which is basically totally unrelated, but which i found the need for > while trying to understand the surrounding code :D). > it's tested with PLAIN (and LOGIN).
I just noticed this... I'm not subscribed to the mailing list and I wasn't on the CC. Your implementation misses GSSAPI support, which is the main reason for my original patch. Please, keep me updated. Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
