On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > Dependencies always had to be specified _after_ the files depending on them. > It usually works anyway because this is only enforced for static > libraries (so presumably for some reason the static libdb is picked > instead of the so), but that doesn't change that specifying the libs > first is wrong and always has been. > It is the reason to have separate LDFLAGS and LIBS variables. > right. i take everything back and claim the opposite. my autoconf-fu has become a bit rusty ... :( for a bit of extra confusion, automake's respective variable is LDADD, and LIBADD for library targets. it's also true that daniel's installation is somehow "weird".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
