On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:12:32PM +0000, Jos van den Oever wrote:
> should this work?
> 
>     mbsync --pull MAILBOX
>     unwrapMails ~/maildir
>     mbsync --push MAILBOX
> 
yes

> I seems like nothing is happening. Perhaps this is because I'm modifying the 
> mails in-place. Would it be better to append ',T' to the wrapper mails and 
> store the attached mails with a new identifier?
>
yes

> If so what would be a good identifier to use?
> 
whatever is compatible with the spec and doesn't contain ,U=nnn segments
which would confuse mbsync.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel

Reply via email to