On Wednesday 10 February 2016 19:25:16 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:12:32PM +0000, Jos van den Oever wrote: > > should this work? > > > > mbsync --pull MAILBOX > > unwrapMails ~/maildir > > mbsync --push MAILBOX > > yes > > > I seems like nothing is happening. Perhaps this is because I'm modifying > > the mails in-place. Would it be better to append ',T' to the wrapper > > mails and store the attached mails with a new identifier? > > yes > > > If so what would be a good identifier to use? > > whatever is compatible with the spec and doesn't contain ,U=nnn segments > which would confuse mbsync.
If I rename the mail file to not contain ',U=nnn', this works fine. I simply remove the ',U-nnn' from the file name. Thank you, Jos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
