Le 07/03/2017 à 10:42, Oswald Buddenhagen a écrit : > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:32:27AM +0100, Florian Lombard wrote: >> Le 07/03/2017 à 10:23, Oswald Buddenhagen a écrit : >>> my work account has an intermediate folder in the hierarchy, and it >>> cannot be manually marked as \noselect, so i use this config: >>> Patterns INBOX* !INBOX/lists >> Unfortunately, I can't do that, that will exclude the subfolders of this >> folder >> > no, it won't. the exclusion pattern is no wildcard. > > the challenge may be reliably identifying the folders that should be > excluded ("it's empty" is not sufficient; adding "has subfolders" may > be). I swear I saw a wilcard :'( I guess i'm exhausted by exchange online ^^ Okay I can deal with that with my python script (which can read folder flags and is actually ignoring those with \NoSelect) and add that to the patterns
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Announcing the Oxford Dictionaries API! The API offers world-renowned dictionary content that is easy and intuitive to access. Sign up for an account today to start using our lexical data to power your apps and projects. Get started today and enter our developer competition. http://sdm.link/oxford _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel