04.04.2018, 10:39, "Oswald Buddenhagen" <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de>: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 06:19:08AM -0600, stef204 wrote: >> 02.04.2018, 03:54, "Oswald Buddenhagen" <oswald.buddenha...@gmx.de>: >> > i would recommend moving (== copy + delete source) the archive on the >> > slave to a separate folder (which is simply not synced) >> >> Do you mean (in Linux) to use "mv"? > > uhm, no? you *do* realize that your mail reader has multi-folder > capabilities and an associated "move" function, right? > (if it *really* doesn't, get a new one, made somewhen in the early > '90s.) >
I do realize MUA's have move functionality. What I didn't realize is that you were referring to moving with the MUA as opposed to interacting directly with fs using a shell . Sort of got lost "in the translation" so to speak, it happens. I'm using Mutt to read the downloaded emails and I will look for the functionality (I am new to Mutt.) But moving 100k emails from within the MUA isn't something I would have considered untll now based on previous experience with GUI MUA's like Thunderbird, etc., They cab be incredibly slow. But that's over an IMAP connection, not local like in this case which will be loads faster. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
