On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 05:55:20AM -0400, synflower--- via isync-devel wrote: > The lack of proxy support in mbsync does seem a glaring omission. > given the available solutions, i'm not sure what exactly would justify this bold statement. also, for which proxy protocol would you want to implement direct support in mbsync? http, socks, tor, i2p, ssh, *all* of them?
_______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
