thanks for the various answers. I've got quite a complex network setup
and couldn't test it yet. I managed to get the VPN work thus so far I
fetch mails via the VPN but I intend to try your solution later on.

Thanks for the great tool.

Best regards
Matt

Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 04:40, synflower--- via isync-devel
<isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit :
>
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:26:57PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> >On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 05:55:20AM -0400, synflower--- via isync-devel wrote:
> >> The lack of proxy support in mbsync does seem a glaring omission.
> >>
> >given the available solutions, i'm not sure what exactly would justify
> >this bold statement. also, for which proxy protocol would you want to
> >implement direct support in mbsync? http, socks, tor, i2p, ssh, *all* of
> >them?
>
> Using an HTTP proxy is not relevant since we are not emitting HTTP
> traffic.
>
> SOCKS5 would be enough -- once you have SOCKS5 support you can use Tor,
> SSH, etc. It's not a high priority feature, but given that msmtp
> supports SOCKS natively I was rather surprised to find this absent from
> mbsync/isync, and spend a fair bit of time paging through the
> documentation vainly looking for the appropriate configuration lines!
>
> At the very least it may be worth adding a note to the documentation that
> `torsocks` (or another solution) is the recommended way of using mbsync
> in situations that require a proxy.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> isync-devel mailing list
> isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel


_______________________________________________
isync-devel mailing list
isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel

Reply via email to