On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Giles Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/04/2009, at 9:31 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > >> Interesting that you find that since CCITT G3/G4 should almost >> always compress 1bit images better than Flate does, since it's >> designed for that type of data. > > Yes, it's surprising how much worse (about an order of magnitude) > CCITT is. The bitmap I am trying to compress is computer generated and > very regular. CCITT was designed for handwriting and typed words, right?
You might investigate also JBIG2 compression for this here bitmap, as iText can insert such images as of 2.1.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php
