On 08/04/2009, at 9:31 PM, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > Interesting that you find that since CCITT G3/G4 should almost > always compress 1bit images better than Flate does, since it's > designed for that type of data.
Yes, it's surprising how much worse (about an order of magnitude) CCITT is. The bitmap I am trying to compress is computer generated and very regular. CCITT was designed for handwriting and typed words, right? Giles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php
