Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > The only difference that I see if that the iText version has everything > described in RGB while the Acrobat one is described in Gray. The Acrobat > versions is therefore more correct and smaller - so I would expect it to > print better than the RGB one.
Look closer: you can select Med ID in one PDF but not in the other. Seems like the glyphs were added using a font in one PDF, but as shapes in the other. This would explain the difference in size, and the bad rendering when printed on a low-resolution device. If I'm right, this is not a problem caused by iText; this is a problem caused by bad use of iText. Back to the OP: why are you adding those glyphs as shapes? As far as I know, that's something you have to do deliberately; iText never chooses to add glyphs as shapes on its own. -- This answer is provided by 1T3XT BVBA http://www.1t3xt.com/ - http://www.1t3xt.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions Buy the iText book: http://www.1t3xt.com/docs/book.php Check the site with examples before you ask questions: http://www.1t3xt.info/examples/ You can also search the keywords list: http://1t3xt.info/tutorials/keywords/
