On 25/09/2012 2:51, billya wrote: > Is my question too complicated? From a technical point of view (the 'literal' question): probably not. From an architectural point of view (the design): I'm not inclined to answer.
> I just want to be able to get the indirect > reference of undercontent (a pdfcontentbyte) from stamper. That's the technical question, but you don't get an answer because of the reason why you need that reference. You want to use an object number so that you can remove content you've added in a later stage of the process. How do you know that the object number won't change somewhere in the process? Why would you use object numbers to do this? > Is my attempted solution wrong-headed? You may have a different opinion, but I think the design is flawed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
