Op 10/01/2013 13:22, Leonard Rosenthol schreef: > Our customers asked that we clearly identify a PDF that contained LTV (vs. > one that did not). That was that term that we determined was simple and > clear in conveying that message. So the following assumption is correct: - not LTV-enabled: the PDF is signed correctly, but doesn't contain all the VRI necessary to validate offline. - LTV-enabled: the PDF is signed correctly and contains all necessary certificates, a valid CRL or OSCP response for every certificate, and a timestamp.
LTV-enabled doesn't refer to the presence of a DSS and/or a Document-Level Timestamp (which was what I assumed). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122712 _______________________________________________ iText-questions mailing list iText-questions@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/itext-questions iText(R) is a registered trademark of 1T3XT BVBA. Many questions posted to this list can (and will) be answered with a reference to the iText book: http://www.itextpdf.com/book/ Please check the keywords list before you ask for examples: http://itextpdf.com/themes/keywords.php
