On May 17 2020, sur-behoffski wrote:
and are in strict conformance with C's definition of how free(3) is mandated to work when its parameter is NULL (codified in C89 standard, and included in all C and C++ standards since).
IMHO it's still better to NOT call free(3) if there is no memory to be released. Let alone changing good code in order to rely on free accepting a NULL pointer too.
_______________________________________________ Iup-users mailing list Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
