De: Andrew Robinson <arobinso...@cox.net> Enviado: terça-feira, 2 de junho de 2020 01:45 Para: Antonio Scuri; r...@gnu.org Cc: IUP discussion list. Assunto: Re: [Iup-users] IUP License Questions
>I see only one download for IUP, not many. The GPL license appears to say that >ALL code linked with GPL source >(that would mean all the GPL static >libraries), must also be disclosed under a GPL license. By providing GPL >static >libraries in a single IUP package instead of having the users download >it separately (which is what "split" would >actually mean), it seems to me >that it might a violation of the GPL license. >But I'm not a lawyer or the author of GPL, so maybe someone else can tell us >if this is legit? Maybe someone like >Richard Stallman, which Google lists as >the author of GPL? Resume: 1. FGTL (LGPL), legal use with DLL or STATIC https://sourceforge.net/projects/ftgl/ 2. Freetype (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC https://sourceforge.net/projects/freetype/ 3. Zlib (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC https://zlib.net/zlib_license.html 4. Scintilla (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC https://www.scintilla.org/License.txt 5. Math Graphics Library (MIT), legal use with DLL or STATIC http://glm.g-truc.net/copying.txt 6. WinDrawLib (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC https://github.com/mity/windrawlib Conclusion, who use IUP library, it is perfectly legal and can be used with commercial software. This answer your question? regards, Ranier Vilela _______________________________________________ Iup-users mailing list Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
