Hi,
apologies in advance if this email doesn't get threaded properly: I
noticed it *after* I subscribed to the list, so I'm just kinda forging
a reply by specifying a meaningful subject.

Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy at linux.intel.com> wrote on Fri
Nov 1 10:45:52 GMT 2013:
> I would really love to hear about things you miss in bmaptool, or about
> various little inconveniences, improvements suggestions, etc. Even if
> this is something small, I'd like to learn about that.

I don't know how much, if at all, bmaptool is related the directory
structure at http://download.tizen.org. But if there's any dependency,
it would be cool if I didn't have to specify the URL of the .bmap and
raw file at all: just the directory that contains them.

E.g.:

# bmaptoo copy 
http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/ivi/tizen_20131031.3/images/ivi-mbr-i586/
/dev/sdb

After all, from that directory name it's possible to reconstract the
name of the .bmap and raw file. And should they be not found, bmaptool
can simply fail.


I take the opportunity to ask: what is the right place to report bugs
on bmaptool? In the last few days I've noticed that it's failing to
verify the checksum because it's been missing in the .bmap file.
Instead of quitting with an exception, bmaptool should just skip the
verification with a warning message.

Salvatore.

-- 
Salvatore Iovene
salvatore dot iovene at intel dot com
_______________________________________________
IVI mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi

Reply via email to