On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 13:30 +0200, Salvatore Iovene wrote: > I don't know how much, if at all, bmaptool is related the directory > structure at http://download.tizen.org.
It is an independent tool, so it has no knowledge about tizen.org. > But if there's any dependency, > it would be cool if I didn't have to specify the URL of the .bmap and > raw file at all: just the directory that contains them. Hmm... Currently it works like this. 1. You give it the image path as input. 2. It automatically discovers the corresponding bmap file, unless --bmap option was used. 3. It starts writing. I guess the following improvement could be made. 1. If the image path is a directory, then try to find an image and a bmap file in it 2. If there is a single match, start writing. 3. Otherwise error out. > E.g.: > > # bmaptoo copy > http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/ivi/ivi/tizen_20131031.3/images/ivi-mbr-i586/ > /dev/sdb I guess then you could just used a fixed command for fetching the latest stuff: bmaptool copy http://blah/latest/ (without specifying the version at all) Is this something you would like to have? > After all, from that directory name it's possible to reconstract the > name of the .bmap and raw file. And should they be not found, bmaptool > can simply fail. Yeah. The bmap file has size of the image file, and checksums of some data. > I take the opportunity to ask: what is the right place to report bugs > on bmaptool? In the last few days I've noticed that it's failing to > verify the checksum because it's been missing in the .bmap file. > Instead of quitting with an exception, bmaptool should just skip the > verification with a warning message. Yeah, yesterday I've realized I sewed it a little bit, my apologies. Check this e-mail please: https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/ivi/2013-October/001338.html Thanks for feed-back! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy _______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
