2013/12/18 VanCutsem, Geoffroy <[email protected]> > QtWayland is just one component if I understand correctly. I think we > should create a new category for all 11 Qt repositories or alternatively > have one Qt5 component that serves as a catch-all for all issues. > > > > Thoughts? >
> I think the one Qt5 component will be sufficient. We need to have in mind that whole development is performed in qt-project. The changes are merged from qt-project.org into tizen.org. Hence I believe we need to consider different types of bugs: 1. Packaging and configuration bugs. Related to Qt configuration in tizen, packages dependency, security privileges. 2. Bugs in Qt. Sometimes related to Qt Tizen Integration. Sometimes affect more wider scope of platforms but only appear in Tizen. In my opinion the first one should be submitted to bugs.tizen.org the latter to bugreports.qt-project.org (there is already QtPorts:Tizen component there). If it is not clear how the bug should be classified then in my mind the more suitable receiver will be tizen.org. We have sufficient infrastructure here to check it out. Currently it doesn't make big change because in practice I will dispatch these bugs and I'm involved in both projects. What do you think about the one Qt5 component?
_______________________________________________ IVI mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/ivi
