----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Mayland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver" 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] Please test 0.4.1 branch!


Ruud Huynen wrote:
Around release 0.3.7f (algorithm) modifications were made to egalize the volume difference between 350 and 500.
I never tried those releases after 0.3.7b(or d).
With the tagged 0.4.0 release I notice a big difference. The 350 is twice as load as the 500. I lived with the older 0.3.7 release, but I never noticed such a big volume difference as with the 0.4.0 release.
   I remember them well, since I made them :)

You're saying if you record the same content on both cards simultaneously at the same volume settings (check ivtvctl -d (dev) -Y), you get a different volume for each card? The code is there to map them both to the same range, and in my objective testing they were the same in recorded files. This is on a pvr-150, but it should be the same on a 500.

I noticed a difference:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin> ./ivtvctl -d /dev/video0 -Y (PVR350)
ioctl: VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL
Brightness = 127
Contrast = 63
Saturation = 63
Hue = 0
Volume = 62225
Mute = 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin> ./ivtvctl -d /dev/video1 -Y (PVR500-1)
ioctl: VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL
Brightness = 127
Contrast = 63
Saturation = 63
Hue = 0
Volume = 61952
Mute = 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/bin> ./ivtvctl -d /dev/video2 -Y (PVR500-2)
ioctl: VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL
Brightness = 127
Contrast = 63
Saturation = 63
Hue = 0
Volume = 61952
Mute = 0

I don't set the volume. Is this the calculated volume from the driver, where 
the value can be different to receive the same volume.
Do I have to set them to the same value.


_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to