Axel Thimm wrote: > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >> The situation would not even arise if ivtv was available as a kernel >> patch (meaning - building with normal kernel tools on vanilla kernel >> *not* custom tools on v4l cvs). That's the canonical kernel way and >> it is supported by Fedora (just drop the patch in the srpm as for >> example the wireless guys have been doing - the wireless tree didn't >> even exist when ivtv declared merging time!)
> The ivtv project has managed to keep its users very happy. New kernels > are supported in a very timely manner and new hardware/tuners the > same. That's what the real user demand is. > > In this sense, thanks to Hans, John, Tyler, Chris, Kevin and all > others involved for their efforts!!! It is worth noting that Hans has been the sole developer since the beginning of the year. All things considered, he is getting an amazing amount of work done. -- Tyler Trafford _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
