On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, John Harvey wrote: >> >> I think this is something you first have to discuss with >> upstream and get their go before publishing such modified >> code and even packaging it for broader consuming. I'm sure >> John, who's the maintainer of the xdriver will listen to any >> suggestions you have. >> >> I'm not saying that the changes are bad. It is just not the >> way oss works, unless you want to fork the project. If you >> really want to fork then please use another versioning, the >> current state will only confuse users. Otherwise please feed >> this list with little patches that can be reviewed. Thanks. >> -- >> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net >>
After the discussion on the list last week, I was going to revert some of the changes I made to the code base so the amount of changes will actually be fairly minimal. The summary of changes will be this: *) the auto-tools stuff will be added *) the end output will product ivtvdev_drv.so My goal isn't to fork anything. Just make things consistent with the rest of the world. I should have these changes done last this week and posted again. Until then, I wouldn't waste time reviewing anything. -- //========================================================\\ || D. Hageman <[email protected]> || \\========================================================// _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
