On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 07:43:49PM +0200, Steve Peterson wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 15:12 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:58:18PM +0200, Wilfried Philips wrote: > > > Steve Peterson wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 23:13 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:34:48PM +0200, Steve Peterson wrote: > > > >>> Just wondering in what time-scale a working xdriver for > > > >>> fedora 5 can be expected ?
According to what you write below, you are developing on rawhide, that has nothing to do with FC5 aynmore. > > > >> Today minus 6 weeks? ;) > > > >> http://atrpms.net/dist/fc5/ivtv_xdriver/ > > > > > > > > er, > > > > (II) LoadModule: "ivtvdev" > > > > (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/ivtvdev_drv.so > > > > (II) Module ivtv: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > > > > compiled for 4.3.99.902, module version = 0.10.6 > > > > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.8 > > > > (EE) module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's version (1) > > > > (II) UnloadModule: "ivtvdev" > > > > (II) Unloading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/ivtvdev_drv.so > > > > (EE) Failed to load module "ivtvdev" (module requirement mismatch, 0) > > > > > > > > Also, it is impossible to compile from the srpm as it requires headers > > > > and directories from the previous incarnation of X-org, just as the > > > > february source. > > > > > > > > What version of X would I have to degrade to for this driver ? > > > > > > I am running xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.0.1-8 in combination with the same > > > ivtv_dr version as you have, without any problems. I am running FC5. > > > Either the x-version is the same one as distributed in FC5, or it is > > > the result of running yum (I do not remember). > > It is unlikely that the ABI changed from release to the updates, I'm > > not sure why Steve has issues with it (?) > If the ABI hasn't changed, perhaps the check routine has. > > Current: > xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.0.99.901-6 > > To be precise xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.0.99.901-6.x86_64.rpm from > redhat-development, or whatever it is called currently. You made me go through loops to detect the problem while it has nothing to do with FC5. :( > (I need the development/testing as there is no point coding on top of > yesterdays code [ this from someone with a garage full of iron you > program by toggling switches :) ] - unfortunately my only 64-bit pc box > is both my development server and the wife's 24/7 multimedia server) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpybq6xtV6fI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
