Am Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2009 20:40:15 schrieb Andy Walls: > On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 14:26 -0500, Andy Walls wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 18:15 +0100, Martin Dauskardt wrote: > > Some corrections to errors: > > My preferences in summary, is that not matter what the digitizer chip: > > My preferences are, in summary, that no matter what the digitizer chip: > > a. I'd like to keep the audio clocks always up to avoid tinny audio. > > > > b. I'd also like to inhibit the video clock and add the delay after > > ^^^ > refine > > > re-enabling the digitizer to avoid the *potential* for a hung machine. > > A value smaller than 300 ms should work, but a value smaller than 40 ms > may not work, if my hypothesis is correct. > > > c. I do not care to much about the delay after disbaling the video > > clock, only that it is empirically "long enough". > > > > Thanks for taking the time to test and comment. > > > > Regards, > > Andy > > Regards, > Andy
I tested various sleep values: http://home.arcor-online.de/martin.dauskardt/digitizer_msleep.xls It seems that we only need a total delay of 300ms between the previous actions in ivtv-streams.c and the start of the capture. This also secures that we don't see disturbance from a previous frequency switch. This happens with smaller sleep values: http://home.arcor-online.de/martin.dauskardt/channelswitch.mpg and can lead to the infamous flickering problem (http://www.gossamer- threads.com/lists/ivtv/devel/32970) . The current driver has this problem only with cx23415 (PVR350), not cx23416. My preference is: -let it how it is (300 ms sleep before the firmware call) or -split the 300ms to 150 and 150 Greets, Martin _______________________________________________ ivtv-devel mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
