The first input doesn't have video, second does.  The audio probem happens
on both from what I can tell, and here's the lspci -vn output for them...

11:08.0 Class 0400: 4444:0016 (rev 01)
        Subsystem: 0070:e807
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 233
        Memory at b4000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
        Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2

11:09.0 Class 0400: 4444:0016 (rev 01)
        Subsystem: 0070:e817
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 50
        Memory at b8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
        Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2



Thanks,
Chris
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:23:08AM -0400, Jean-Francois Thibert (SageTV) wrote:
> That's interesting, on which input does this problem happen? Also what model 
> # 
> of pvr500 is it?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Jean-Francois Thibert
> 
> On May 20, 2005 11:08 am, Chris Kennedy wrote:
> > On a pvr500 it shows no video, and the audio is totally noisy and goes
> > from low pitch to high pitch, just wrecks it basically.  So seems it
> > needs some different logic for those, and don't want to break them.
> > If you can make a patch with just those settings I'll test them on
> > the pvr500 and include them, but seems we need some more research into
> > what is going on since it breaks the pvr500 so badly.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 11:00:28AM -0400, Jean-Francois Thibert (SageTV) 
> wrote:
> > > May I ask why you are going back to the old cx25840? I'd like to hear
> > > about any problems it caused...At the very least I think you should keep
> > > the adc sets to 3 when disabled and force no_black_magic to 1 (or remove
> > > that code since it's doing tda settings inside the cx25840 module)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Jean-Francois Thibert
> > >
> > > On May 20, 2005 10:24 am, Chris Kennedy wrote:
> > > > This is the actual fixes there, last version was not the right one.
> > > > Also please go back and check the cx25840 driver patch and people need
> > > > to figure out what is wrong there so we can get the improvements from
> > > > it, but right now it breaks everything quite badly so can't include it
> > > > till people report success.
> > > >
> > > > #0.3.5: http://www.ivtv.tv/releases/ivtv-0.3/
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Chris
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
> > > Want to be the first software developer in space?
> > > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ivtv-devel mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
> Want to be the first software developer in space?
> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> ivtv-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel

-- 
---
 Chris Kennedy / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Engineer KMOS-TV/KTBG-FM
  Broadcasting Services Department
  Central Missouri State University


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
ivtv-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ivtv-devel

Reply via email to