Hi, On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:57:18AM +1100, Ross wrote: > On 12/20/05, Axel Thimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:16:04PM +0100, Ib Uhrskov wrote: > > > > Hmm, the encoder firmware in the newest rpm is still version 2.04.024 > > > but the driver suggests > > > > > > ivtv0 warning: Encoder Firmware can be buggy, use version 0x02040011 or > > > 0x02050032 > > > > The contents of the firmware rpms were not modified, only the names > > adapted. So you're still using the same firmware with its pros and > > cons. > > What are the pros of the non-recommended firmware?
It's the same firmware used by all FC/RH users for over a year now. It's been downloaded almost 40000 times since, so it looks like a solid firmware, and I wouldn't like to change two variables at a time. But I'm open to any observations made when comparing the firmwares. > Also, doesn't 0.4.1 use hotplug by default now? If it does, I expect > the location (not only filename) of the firmware will also need to be > changed. Yes, but 0.4.1 checks the legacy location, too. That's OK for now, as the default hotplug location for firmwares changes with every new FC release. BTW is there any build-time detection mechanism to find out where hotplug will look for the firmware? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
pgpHbp1P0FbOi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
