Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 09:44:14AM -0500, Keith C wrote: >> On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Derek Whitten wrote: >> >>> Keith C wrote: >>>> Just read my early response and it wasn't correct. Many of us are >>>> using FC5, but few have gotten kernel 2.6.17 working yet, as ivtv 0.7 >>>> has just been released for that kernel. You'd be very safe using the >>>> 2.6.16 series from atrpms, but I imagine that we're pretty close to >>>> having 2.6.17 working from atrpms as well. >>>> >>>> Keith C >>>> >>> I have it working here with my PVR-250, 2.6.17 kernel, slackware 10.2 >>> >>> uname -a >>> Linux homer 2.6.17 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jun 18 09:40:33 PDT 2006 i686 >>> pentium4 i386 GNU/Linux >>> >>> cat /etc/slackware-version >>> Slackware 10.2.0 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# >>> >>> ivtv: ==================== START INIT IVTV ==================== >>> ivtv: version 0.8.0 (development revision 3349M) loading >>> ivtv: Linux version: 2.6.17 SMP preempt mod_unload PENTIUM4 gcc-3.4 >> His question was about getting fully functionally straight from >> atrpms, without building anything. I see you've got 0.8.0 running on >> 2.6.17, which means you've also got an updated v4l. Are you running >> the bleeding/testing packages from atrpms, or building those >> yourself? If they work from atrpms, that's definitely useful in some >> situations. > > ATrpms doesn't support slackware, yet. ;) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ivtv-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
this is all built by hand.. i'm not a big fan of .rpms anyway (most of them don't have the options i need).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ivtv-users mailing list [email protected] http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
