On Sunday 04 March 2007 23:08, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:42:38PM +0000, Jerome Hettich wrote:
> > Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > 20070302 already includes ivtv, so perhaps you should try w/o
> > > ivtv-kmdl? That's probably also the reason for the issues you
> > > have.
> >
> > Thanks Axel
> >
> > I gave this a try removing ivtv-kmdl and running with
> > video4linux-kmdl as you suggested but video4linux 20070302 does
> > not seem to contain the ivtv-fb module so I can no longer run x on
> > the PVR350
>
> Hm, something must be wrong. Or perhaps ivtv-fb wasn't submitted yet
> to video4linux? Hans may know what's the background.
ivtv-fb wasn't submitted to video4linux. Nor will it, since it is part
of the framebuffer subsystem, not of v4l. I hope that ivtv-fb can be
added in 2.6.22, but no guarantees.
The ivtv as is now part of the v4l-dvb repository should NOT be used
since there are no applications that use the new API yet.
Hope this helps,
Hans
> > The ivtv-kmdl-2.6.19-1.2911.6.4.fc6 which does contain ivtv-fb does
> > not live happily together with video4linux 20070302 as described
> > previously.
> >
> > I therefore conclude there is currently no longer a way to run the
> > ivtv framebuffer on Fedora Core 6 with the 2.6.19-1.2911.6.4 kernel
> > and the atrpms package - is this correct?
>
> Currently, yes. Maybe I should rebuild older video4linux packages or
> if the real issue is found fix that.
_______________________________________________
ivtv-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-users
